Create the URL list from multiple sources
Site map, content management system, internal link scanning, and search performance records can show different pages. Compare these lists to identify redirects, removed pages, and unconnected content. Do not act on the assumption that a single browsing tool has found all URLs conclusively; especially filters and fields that require sessions are also examined.
Separate access and indexing decision
Opening a URL does not mean that it will be included in the search results. The status code, robots instructions, noindex and canonical goal must be checked for the same purpose. Do not confuse the settings of the live environment with the test environment. The fact that an important page accidentally displays a different URL makes it difficult to evaluate the content work.
Address the speed problem with its source
Large visuals, unnecessary third-party codes, and heavy interactions are points of study. Evaluate the mobile user experience with real device and connection conditions. LCP upload, INP interactivity, CLS provide signal in terms of visual stability; a single laboratory measurement is not the experience of all visitors. Give priority to the problem that affects the user's main task.
Confirm the effect of correction
The solution is not complete if shrinking the image makes the text unreadable. After the change, recheck critical pages, forms, and menu. A list of errors should include responsible, priority, affected URL, and verification step. Kortex Digital Reklam Ajansı handles the technical layout with content and design decisions.
Sources: Web.dev: Core Web Vitals.
Check before you start
- Have the URLs scanned with the site map been compared?
- Are the canonical goals of important pages accurate?
- Does mobile basic tasks work after correction?
